In a move aimed at expanding access to higher education, Harvard University announced Monday that it will offer free tuition to students from families earning $200,000 or less starting in the 2025-2026 academic year. This marks a significant expansion of the university’s financial aid program, further removing financial barriers for prospective students.
Students from families with incomes below $100,000 will also have all expenses covered, including housing, food, health insurance, and travel costs. Previously, Harvard provided full financial support only to students from families earning less than $85,000 annually.
“Putting Harvard within financial reach for more individuals widens the array of backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives that all of our students encounter, fostering their intellectual and personal growth,” said Harvard President Alan Garber.
While tuition alone at Harvard currently exceeds $56,000, total costs, including housing and other fees, approach $83,000 per year. The new policy will significantly lessen that burden for many American families.
Families earning above $200,000 may still qualify for tailored financial aid depending on individual circumstances.
This initiative aligns with similar policies at other elite institutions, like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), which announced a comparable expansion last fall. Harvard estimates that 86% of U.S. families will now be eligible for some level of financial aid.
“Harvard has long sought to open our doors to the most talented students, no matter their financial circumstances,” said Hopkins Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences. “This investment ensures that every admitted student can pursue their academic passions and contribute to shaping our future.”
The expansion comes amid broader conversations about diversity in higher education, especially following the Supreme Court’s ruling against affirmative action in college admissions. Harvard, along with other institutions like the University of Pennsylvania, views increased financial aid as a pathway to maintaining diversity by ensuring access to students from varied socioeconomic backgrounds.
“We know the most talented students come from different socioeconomic backgrounds and experiences, from every state and around the globe,” said William Fitzsimmons, Harvard’s dean of admissions and financial aid. “Our financial aid is critical to ensuring that these students know Harvard College is a place where they can thrive.”
This policy marks a continued effort to create a more inclusive and accessible environment at one of the nation’s most prestigious universities.
When President Donald Trump unveiled the $500 billion Stargate AI venture on Tuesday, a partnership involving OpenAI, SoftBank, and Oracle, he touted it as a groundbreaking step toward cementing U.S. dominance in artificial intelligence. Trump claimed the project would ensure “the future of technology” while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and tackling issues like cancer detection. Wall Street initially responded with cautious optimism, but as the details of Stargate emerge, skepticism is mounting, and for good reason in my opinion.
A Bold Promise Without a Foundation
At first glance, Stargate appears ambitious, even transformative. Backed by OpenAI’s cutting-edge technology, SoftBank’s financial clout, and Oracle’s infrastructure expertise, the venture has been pitched as a game-changer for AI research and development. Yet, serious doubts are surfacing about its feasibility and motives.
Tech billionaire Elon Musk, a former co-founder of OpenAI and a longtime critic of the organization’s direction, wasted no time questioning the project’s funding. “They don’t actually have the money,” Musk wrote on X. SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son claims an initial $100 billion commitment with plans to grow it to $500 billion over four years, but whether those funds will materialize remains unclear. It’s not the first time SoftBank has made lofty promises and its track record includes overestimated ventures like the Vision Fund.
AI for Good or AI for Profit?
One of the most striking concerns is the ethical implications of Stargate. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison described the project as a way to solve pressing societal issues, like developing cancer vaccines through AI-driven genetic sequencing. While this paints a rosy picture, skeptics question whether these lofty claims are just a smokescreen for profit-driven motives. Musk has repeatedly accused OpenAI of abandoning its original mission to develop AI for the public good, turning instead into a profit-driven enterprise that prioritizes corporate interests.
Donald Trump’s decision to repeal his predecessor’s AI guardrails and policies designed to ensure ethical and safe development of AI, has opened the door to unchecked advancements. Without these safeguards, Stargate’s potential for misuse, whether through biased algorithms, privacy violations, or the militarization of AI, is alarming. Who will ensure that this technology is developed responsibly and does not deepen societal inequalities or threaten democratic systems?
An Economic Boon or Another False Promise?
Trump and Altman have touted the potential for Stargate to create hundreds of thousands of American jobs, particularly in construction and data center operations. However, these promises are eerily reminiscent of past grandiose projects that failed to deliver from the Biden administration. Mega-investments often come with overblown job projections, only to fall short once automation replaces human labor. Even if Stargate reaches its employment goals, questions linger about the quality of these jobs and their long-term sustainability.
A cornerstone of the Stargate project is the construction of massive data centers, which are essential for powering the AI infrastructure envisioned by OpenAI, SoftBank, and Oracle. While these centers promise to create jobs and drive technological advancement, their environmental and societal impacts are deeply concerning. Data centers consume enormous amounts of electricity and water, often straining local resources without providing long-term economic benefits to surrounding communities. Questions about data privacy, cybersecurity, and ownership also loom large, as these facilities will centralize vast amounts of sensitive information in the hands of private corporations. With promises of rapid scalability and a $500 billion price tag, it’s unclear whether such an ambitious undertaking can be achieved responsibly or whether the public will once again bear the hidden costs of unchecked corporate ambition.
Geopolitical Implications: Competing with China
Stargate is also being framed as a key weapon in the U.S.’s competition with China for AI supremacy. While strengthening America’s technological edge is important, rushing into a $500 billion project without transparency or strategic oversight risks creating a “tech cold war” that prioritizes dominance over ethical innovation. Accelerating AI development without proper international collaboration could exacerbate global tensions and lead to a dangerous arms race in AI technology.
What Stargate Really Represents
Beneath the glossy promises of economic growth and transformative technology, Stargate raises deeper questions about power, control, and the future of AI. By handing the reins to corporate behemoths like SoftBank, Oracle, and OpenAI, the U.S. risks placing critical technological advancements into the hands of entities more interested in profits than public welfare. This is not just about building data centers or detecting cancer, it’s about who gets to decide how AI shapes our world.
Trump’s willingness to prioritize corporate interests over ethical considerations should alarm all Americans from both parties. Without a commitment to transparency, regulation, and equity, Stargate could deepen societal divides and erode trust in technology. As history has shown, unchecked technological advancements often come at a steep cost to those least equipped to bear it.
“Our third quarter financial performance was challenging and below our expectations,” Joel Quadracci, CEO of the commercial printing firm, said in a statement.
Quadracci said the company would move swiftly to slice costs and bring them in line with sales.
Quad did not say how many jobs it might cut, or identify any plants for closing. However, spokeswoman Claire Ho suggested that the firm’s operations in Wisconsin, where it employs 7,000 people at 14 facilities, are not high on the target list for closures.
Quad continues to move work to its most efficient printing and distribution plants, and the Wisconsin operations are “among the most efficient platforms in the entire printing industry,” Ho said in an email. She said Quad is still hiring in Wisconsin.
The company, the biggest printer of magazines and catalogs in North America, operates 57 printing plants in the U.S. and another eight outside the country. It employs 24,000 people worldwide.
However, like other printers, it has seen demand dampened by the rise of the Internet and digital technologies such as iPads and other tablets.
In its annual report filed with securities regulators last March, Quad noted that prices for printing had “declined significantly in recent years.”
Tuesday, Quadracci said in his statement that pricing pressure accelerated during the three months that ended Sept. 30, while Quad’s manufacturing productivity declined.
The firm’s sales for the three months ended Sept. 30 totaled $1.16 billion, down 6.5% from the $1.24 billion in third-quarter 2014 revenue.
The company booked a loss of $552.2 million, or $11.50 a share, in the quarter. But that stemmed almost entirely from a $532.6 million non-cash, after-tax charge Quad recorded for “goodwill impairment” triggered by the decline in the firm’s stock price.
Before Tuesday’s announcement, Quad’s stock closed at $13.10, down 18 cents.
The company went public in July 2010 at $49. Its shares traded above $40 for almost a year, then plunged. They rebounded above $30 in 2013, but have trended downward for the last two years.
The slide in the stock notwithstanding, Quad generates enough cash to pay a hefty dividend — at least at the prices of the last two years. The current dividend of $1.20 a year amounts to roughly 9% of Tuesday’s closing price.
Quad on Tuesday declared another 30-cent quarterly dividend.
The company also reduced its 2015 revenue estimates by about $200 million. Previously, Quad had estimated sales of $4.8 billion to $4.9 billion for the year. The firm now expects $4.6 billion to $4.7 billion in revenue.
Since 2009, Quad has more than doubled its revenue, in large measure through acquisitions.
Quadracci may disclose details of the company’s cutback plans this morning during a conference call with analysts.
Quad/Graphics is an American printing company, based in Sussex, Wisconsin. It was founded on July 13, 1971, by Harry V. Quadracci, son of Harry R. Quadracci.
Headquarters: Sussex, WI
Company Website: qg.com
CEO: Joel Quadracci
Founded: 1971
“While we have made progress on our goals over time, we are not content and will continue to take bold actions to grow and develop our diverse talent,” notes Intel CEO Brian Krzanich
Nkozi Knight 