Shades of Gray: The Historical Impact of Political Policies and the Importance of Knowing Our Past

Decades ago, the corridors of American politics witnessed a series of decisions that would dramatically reshape the landscape of African American communities. This story begins in the halls of power, where policies and laws were crafted, setting off a chain of events that would echo through generations. From the Reagan era’s war on drugs to the legislative intricacies underpinning Joe Biden’s rise in the political arena, these decisions painted a complex picture of intention versus impact. This aim is to untangle this complex web, tracing the roots of policies that have left a lasting imprint on society. We delve into the intricate interplay of legislation and its intended consequences, piecing together how political maneuvers have sculpturally shaped the realities of countless individuals and communities across the nation.

The 1980s, under the presidency of Ronald Reagan, marked a pivotal era where international intrigue and domestic policy collided. The Iran-Contra Affair, a scandal defined by covert arms sales and secret funding, not only dominated headlines but also served as a backdrop to the escalating War on Drugs. This war, declared with a mission to eradicate drug abuse, inadvertently laid the groundwork for a crisis in African American communities.

Simultaneously, a young senator named Joe Biden was rising through the political ranks. A figure who would come to shape significant aspects of criminal justice policy, Biden’s career in the 1980s and beyond reflects the complex relationship between American politics and the African American community. His role in shaping the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, with its disparate sentencing for crack and powder cocaine, had far-reaching impacts, disproportionately affecting African Americans and contributing to a surge in incarceration rates.

As the narrative progressed into the 1990s, Biden’s influence continued to grow. His involvement in crafting the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act further entrenched the trend of mass incarceration. Though aimed at addressing rampant crime, the bill’s consequences rippled through African American communities, deepening the chasms of inequality.

Decades later, during his 2020 presidential campaign, Biden’s rhetoric reflected a shift. His acknowledgment of the impact of these policies, coupled with promises of reform, marked a departure from his earlier stances. However, this shift was not without its controversies. Biden’s declaration in a 2020 interview that questioned African American allegiance to the Democratic Party sparked a conversation about the taken-for-granted African American vote in U.S. politics.

Biden’s long-standing pledge to Zionism, mirroring the broader U.S. political landscape’s support for Israel, further adds to the narrative’s complexity. It reflects a broader theme in American politics: the alignment of foreign policy interests, often at the expense of addressing pressing domestic issues.

The story of U.S. drug policy and its impact on African American communities, intertwined with Biden’s career, stands as a testament to the cyclical nature of political priorities and the often contradictory nature of government policies. It highlights a dissonance between the quest for votes from minority communities and the legislative actions that have historically impacted them.

This evolving narrative, chronicled over several decades and various administrations, is not merely a historical account; it serves as a reflective mirror for American society. In an era where political promises ebb and flow with the tide of public opinion, the importance of scrutinizing policy decisions and understanding their long-term impacts becomes paramount. As voters, the responsibility lies in our hands to delve into the history of those we elect into power.

It’s a reminder that genuine representation in the corridors of power and accountability are not just political ideals but necessities. As we stand at the crossroads of another election, it is crucial to remember that the votes we cast are echoes of our collective history and aspirations. We must challenge ourselves to look beyond the rhetoric, to understand the past of those we entrust with our future, ensuring our decisions are informed, and our voices are heard in shaping a more equitable and just society. As James Baldwin once said, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.”

The Lingering Shadows of Imperialism: Exploitation of African Nations

As someone who has served in the military, I’ve had firsthand insight into the geopolitical dynamics that still play out across the globe. One particular issue that has always been close to my heart is the persistent exploitation of African nations by former colonial powers and the United States.

Niger, a landlocked country in West Africa, serves as a stark example. It is the source of 5% of the world’s uranium, a precious resource vital for nuclear energy and weapons. Yet, despite its immense wealth beneath the ground, Niger consistently ranks as one of the world’s poorest countries. This incongruity can be attributed to the continued imperialism and exploitative tactics employed by Western nations.

Historically, countries like France and Great Britain have left indelible marks on Africa, ostensibly ending colonization, but in truth, perpetuating a new form of neocolonialism. France, for instance, still exerts considerable economic influence on many of its former colonies, including Niger. Complex agreements and unequal trade dynamics ensure that while African nations supply raw materials, they see only a fraction of the profits.

The United States, though not a colonial power in Africa, has also been implicated in this exploitative dynamic. The establishment of military bases across the continent serves dual purposes: it’s positioned as a safeguard against extremism and other threats, but it also ensures that the U.S. maintains a stronghold to protect its interests, which often include access to natural resources. During my time in the military, it was evident how strategic positioning wasn’t just about national security, but also about economic leverage.

Furthermore, it’s worth noting that while African countries export raw materials, they often have to import finished products at higher prices, further entrenching them in a cycle of poverty. The revenues from these natural resources, like uranium from Niger, do not equitably benefit the local communities. Instead, profits are siphoned off by multinational corporations and corrupt leaders, leaving the general populace grappling with poverty, unemployment, and underdevelopment.

Addressing this exploitation requires a multipronged approach:

  1. Transparency in Trade Deals: International trade agreements involving African nations must be transparent, ensuring that they benefit local communities as much as they do foreign entities.
  2. Empowering Local Economies: Investing in local infrastructure, education, and healthcare can help African nations process their own resources, creating jobs and reducing dependency on imports.
  3. International Accountability: Global institutions, such as the UN, must hold countries accountable for exploitative practices, ushering in a new era of equitable and fair trade.

While the flags of colonial powers no longer fly over African capitals, the shadows of imperialism linger. It’s a collective responsibility, both of African governments and the international community, to dismantle these remnants of exploitation and pave the way for a brighter, more equitable future for the continent. As someone who has seen the intricacies of this exploitation up close, I urge everyone to educate themselves, advocate for change, and support policies that promote fairness and justice.

Fitch Downgrades U.S. Credit Rating Amid Rising Deficits and Political Turmoil

In a recent blow to the United States, Fitch Ratings has downgraded the nation’s credit rating from the highest possible AAA to AA+. The rating agency attributed the drop to increasing deficits and political conflict, which they believe threaten the government’s capacity to service its debts.

This decision was made two months following a last-minute agreement between the Biden administration and House Republicans to temporarily raise the debt ceiling, thereby narrowly dodging a potentially catastrophic federal default.

This isn’t the first time the U.S. has faced such a demotion. Back in 2011, amid a similar crisis regarding the debt ceiling, Standard & Poor’s reduced the United States’ AAA rating. At present, Moody’s Investors Service is the only major credit rating agency that continues to assign the U.S. the top AAA rating.

Despite recognizing the robustness of the U.S. economy and the benefits reaped from the dollar’s position as the world’s primary currency, Fitch expressed concerns about the escalating deficits and both political parties’ reluctance to address long-term fiscal issues. Fitch voiced limited faith in the government’s ability to effectively manage the country’s finances.

In response to the downgrade, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen criticized Fitch’s decision as “arbitrary” and reliant on obsolete data. She emphasized that “Treasury securities remain the world’s preeminent safe and liquid asset” and affirmed the underlying strength of the U.S. economy.

According to Fitch, the expenditure caps set as part of the recent debt agreement in June merely scratch the surface of the overall budget and do not confront enduring issues, such as financing Social Security and Medicare for an aging populace.

With tax reductions and elevated government expenditure leading to an expansion of deficits in recent years, and coupled with increasing interest rates, the fiscal burden has grown. Government interest payments in the first nine months of the current fiscal year amounted to $652 billion, marking a 25% rise from the same period last year.

Maya Macguineas, the president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, responded to the downgrade, terming it a “wake-up call.” She stressed the urgent need for fiscal responsibility, stating, “We are clearly on an unsustainable fiscal path. We need to do better.”

The repeated political standoffs over the debt ceiling have not only eroded the faith in U.S. fiscal management but also put the longstanding reputation of U.S. government bonds at risk. For close to a hundred years, these bonds have been considered some of the safest investments globally, primarily because the U.S. seemed unlikely to default on payments.

However, with the recent debt ceiling impasses, there is growing concern that the U.S. might default for the first time. Over a decade ago, S&P pointed out political discord as a significant risk to the country’s governing ability, and many experts opine that the situation has deteriorated since.

What Emmett Till’s Mother Taught Me About Grief and Justice

On Feb. 26, 2012, my entire life changed in ways that I could never imagine. Within an instant, after the brutal and inhumane killing of my son, …

What Emmett Till’s Mother Taught Me About Grief and Justice

Five ways of expanding your business internationally

The global economy is changing thanks to worldwide connectivity. Companies across the globe are communicating with others without delays or hassles …

Five ways of expanding your business internationally

President Obama Speaks After Terrorism Briefing

19369685-mmmain

“We will not be terrorized.” ~ President Obama

President Obama states that his office does not have any credible information about an imminent terror attack. His three plan approach includes attacking terrorist in the Middle East, preventing terrorist from getting into the United States, and stepping up efforts to prevent attacks on American soil from both foreign and domestic terrorist.

 

Quad/Graphics plans to close plants, cut $100M in costs

hqdefault

“Our third quarter financial performance was challenging and below our expectations,” Joel Quadracci, CEO of the commercial printing firm, said in a statement.

Quadracci said the company would move swiftly to slice costs and bring them in line with sales.

Quad did not say how many jobs it might cut, or identify any plants for closing. However, spokeswoman Claire Ho suggested that the firm’s operations in Wisconsin, where it employs 7,000 people at 14 facilities, are not high on the target list for closures.

Quad continues to move work to its most efficient printing and distribution plants, and the Wisconsin operations are “among the most efficient platforms in the entire printing industry,” Ho said in an email. She said Quad is still hiring in Wisconsin.

The company, the biggest printer of magazines and catalogs in North America, operates 57 printing plants in the U.S. and another eight outside the country. It employs 24,000 people worldwide.

However, like other printers, it has seen demand dampened by the rise of the Internet and digital technologies such as iPads and other tablets.

In its annual report filed with securities regulators last March, Quad noted that prices for printing had “declined significantly in recent years.”

Tuesday, Quadracci said in his statement that pricing pressure accelerated during the three months that ended Sept. 30, while Quad’s manufacturing productivity declined.

The firm’s sales for the three months ended Sept. 30 totaled $1.16 billion, down 6.5% from the $1.24 billion in third-quarter 2014 revenue.

The company booked a loss of $552.2 million, or $11.50 a share, in the quarter. But that stemmed almost entirely from a $532.6 million non-cash, after-tax charge Quad recorded for “goodwill impairment” triggered by the decline in the firm’s stock price.

Before Tuesday’s announcement, Quad’s stock closed at $13.10, down 18 cents.

The company went public in July 2010 at $49. Its shares traded above $40 for almost a year, then plunged. They rebounded above $30 in 2013, but have trended downward for the last two years.

The slide in the stock notwithstanding, Quad generates enough cash to pay a hefty dividend — at least at the prices of the last two years. The current dividend of $1.20 a year amounts to roughly 9% of Tuesday’s closing price.

Quad on Tuesday declared another 30-cent quarterly dividend.

The company also reduced its 2015 revenue estimates by about $200 million. Previously, Quad had estimated sales of $4.8 billion to $4.9 billion for the year. The firm now expects $4.6 billion to $4.7 billion in revenue.

Since 2009, Quad has more than doubled its revenue, in large measure through acquisitions.

Quadracci may disclose details of the company’s cutback plans this morning during a conference call with analysts.

About Rick Romell

author thumbnail

Rick Romell covers retail and general business news.

Quad/Graphics is an American printing company, based in Sussex, Wisconsin. It was founded on July 13, 1971, by Harry V. Quadracci, son of Harry R. Quadracci.
Headquarters: Sussex, WI
Company Website: qg.com
CEO: Joel Quadracci
Founded: 1971